<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Company Spotlight: Bug Labs versus… Apple?  Part Two.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.jwegener.com/2009/04/23/bug-labs-versus-apple-dominant-hardware-platform-part2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.jwegener.com/2009/04/23/bug-labs-versus-apple-dominant-hardware-platform-part2/</link>
	<description>Jonathan Wegener's Technology/Marketing Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 22:34:04 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Wegener</title>
		<link>http://blog.jwegener.com/2009/04/23/bug-labs-versus-apple-dominant-hardware-platform-part2/comment-page-1/#comment-116</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Wegener</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 05:11:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jwegener.com/?p=317#comment-116</guid>
		<description>Peter and Fred,&lt;br&gt;Thanks so much for your comments.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Peter -- You make a really interesting point (and one I overlooked) about the hardware market not being limited to devices requiring a user interface.  Your examples of energy systems and automobiles getting online are interesting ones too.   Congratulations by the way on Bug Labs&#039; launch of the new prototyping and app services -- i look forward to hearing more about those.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter and Fred,<br />Thanks so much for your comments.</p>
<p>Peter &#8212; You make a really interesting point (and one I overlooked) about the hardware market not being limited to devices requiring a user interface.  Your examples of energy systems and automobiles getting online are interesting ones too.   Congratulations by the way on Bug Labs&#39; launch of the new prototyping and app services &#8212; i look forward to hearing more about those.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Semmelhack</title>
		<link>http://blog.jwegener.com/2009/04/23/bug-labs-versus-apple-dominant-hardware-platform-part2/comment-page-1/#comment-113</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Semmelhack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 17:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jwegener.com/?p=317#comment-113</guid>
		<description>Jon - thanks very much for the analysis.  Apple&#039;s achievement in this space is inarguable.  As much for their marketing as their technical achievement.  But embedded in this discussion is the assumption that the long tail of devices is based on applications that work well on the iPhone!  I think this is a false choice.  We have all been trained to believe that WE should be at the center of the network.  And in many ways we should be.  But we will now have to start sharing the stage with machines.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cisco has called it the &quot;Internet of Everything&quot; and it&#039;s becoming a reality.  For example, we&#039;re working with companies doing interesting things getting automobiles and trucks (basically anything that moves) on the net.  Applications that have NO user interface.  Users interact with the system via a web browser located somewhere else.  Maybe even on an iPhone :)  Others are working on getting their energy systems on the net.  Accenture calls this trend &quot;trivergence&quot; which points to an emerging information architecture that separates the content from the application from the interface.  We&#039;re seeing evidence of this in many places.  The point is, there are hundreds if not thousands of applications for markets that are not suitable for the iPhone.  Nor is Apple interested in them.  Individually they are too small. But collectively they all make up this long tail.  Bug Labs approach allows innovators to explore and profitably enter these markets quickly and at lower cost.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ultimately, we&#039;re not trying to make people do things &quot;our way&quot; vs. Apple&#039;s &quot;way&quot;.  We&#039;re much more interested in just making it easier for everyone to innovate with hardware.  I think there&#039;s plenty of room in the market for all sorts of players right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jon &#8211; thanks very much for the analysis.  Apple&#39;s achievement in this space is inarguable.  As much for their marketing as their technical achievement.  But embedded in this discussion is the assumption that the long tail of devices is based on applications that work well on the iPhone!  I think this is a false choice.  We have all been trained to believe that WE should be at the center of the network.  And in many ways we should be.  But we will now have to start sharing the stage with machines.  </p>
<p>Cisco has called it the &#8220;Internet of Everything&#8221; and it&#39;s becoming a reality.  For example, we&#39;re working with companies doing interesting things getting automobiles and trucks (basically anything that moves) on the net.  Applications that have NO user interface.  Users interact with the system via a web browser located somewhere else.  Maybe even on an iPhone <img src='http://blog.jwegener.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   Others are working on getting their energy systems on the net.  Accenture calls this trend &#8220;trivergence&#8221; which points to an emerging information architecture that separates the content from the application from the interface.  We&#39;re seeing evidence of this in many places.  The point is, there are hundreds if not thousands of applications for markets that are not suitable for the iPhone.  Nor is Apple interested in them.  Individually they are too small. But collectively they all make up this long tail.  Bug Labs approach allows innovators to explore and profitably enter these markets quickly and at lower cost.</p>
<p>Ultimately, we&#39;re not trying to make people do things &#8220;our way&#8221; vs. Apple&#39;s &#8220;way&#8221;.  We&#39;re much more interested in just making it easier for everyone to innovate with hardware.  I think there&#39;s plenty of room in the market for all sorts of players right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fredwilson</title>
		<link>http://blog.jwegener.com/2009/04/23/bug-labs-versus-apple-dominant-hardware-platform-part2/comment-page-1/#comment-112</link>
		<dc:creator>fredwilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 09:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jwegener.com/?p=317#comment-112</guid>
		<description>no question that iphone/itouch has taken a lot of opportunity away from Bug Labs. but i think that their focus on helping enteprise customers with the development of &quot;long tail&quot; devices is a smart strategy. they can create any module that the enterprise customer might want and not all devices work with part of it hanging off a 30 pin connector.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no question that iphone/itouch has taken a lot of opportunity away from Bug Labs. but i think that their focus on helping enteprise customers with the development of &#8220;long tail&#8221; devices is a smart strategy. they can create any module that the enterprise customer might want and not all devices work with part of it hanging off a 30 pin connector.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ashish</title>
		<link>http://blog.jwegener.com/2009/04/23/bug-labs-versus-apple-dominant-hardware-platform-part2/comment-page-1/#comment-111</link>
		<dc:creator>ashish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 04:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jwegener.com/?p=317#comment-111</guid>
		<description>Great article, Jon! I would be curious to hear Bug Lab&#039;s reaction to the iPhone being a threat. What type of customers are they seeing now? Can their needs be met by the iPhone&#039;s hardware/software platform?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article, Jon! I would be curious to hear Bug Lab&#39;s reaction to the iPhone being a threat. What type of customers are they seeing now? Can their needs be met by the iPhone&#39;s hardware/software platform?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
